<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Name and Shame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recruitment-views.com/name-and-shame/418/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recruitment-views.com/name-and-shame/418</link>
	<description>My Views and thoughts on the Recruitment industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.recruitment-views.com/name-and-shame/418/comment-page-1#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recruitment-views.com/?p=418#comment-215</guid>
		<description>A good point Ben, but have you heard of the term passive candidate, because that is what I was. Someone not unnecessarily looking but just maybe for the right opportunity. It was up David to try to hook me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good point Ben, but have you heard of the term passive candidate, because that is what I was. Someone not unnecessarily looking but just maybe for the right opportunity. It was up David to try to hook me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.recruitment-views.com/name-and-shame/418/comment-page-1#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recruitment-views.com/?p=418#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Surely the recruiter got it right in your linkedin example, They weeded out a candidate (you) who wasn&#039;t serious about looking for a new position.  I&#039;m actually quite surprised that a professional within the recruitment industry would go around applying for jobs that they actually had no interest in seriously applying for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the recruiter got it right in your linkedin example, They weeded out a candidate (you) who wasn&#8217;t serious about looking for a new position.  I&#8217;m actually quite surprised that a professional within the recruitment industry would go around applying for jobs that they actually had no interest in seriously applying for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise Triance</title>
		<link>http://www.recruitment-views.com/name-and-shame/418/comment-page-1#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise Triance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recruitment-views.com/?p=418#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Stephen

I&#039;ve just come across another blog post relevant to yours: http://www.ere.net/blogs/improving_the_recruiting_experience/65E38281483A4490AF4B1874A6AA92B6.asp

Why do recruiters continue to get it wrong?

Regards, Louise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just come across another blog post relevant to yours: <a href="http://www.ere.net/blogs/improving_the_recruiting_experience/65E38281483A4490AF4B1874A6AA92B6.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.ere.net/blogs/improving_the_recruiting_experience/65E38281483A4490AF4B1874A6AA92B6.asp</a></p>
<p>Why do recruiters continue to get it wrong?</p>
<p>Regards, Louise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
